Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

OR

Commission File Number 000-19514

Gulfport Energy Corporation

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

14313 North May Avenue, Suite 100

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73134

(405) 848-8807

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive office)

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

As of August 8, 2005, 31,935,687 shares of common stock were outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):    Yes  ¨    No  x

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT

2

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

June 30, 2005 and 2004

Forming a part of Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report to the

Securities and Exchange Commission

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB should be read in conjunction with Gulfport Energy Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004.

3

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEET

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

These financial statements have been prepared by Gulfport Energy Corporation (the “Company” or “Gulfport”) without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods, on a basis consistent with the annual audited financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Certain information, accounting policies, and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the summary of significant accounting policies and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent annual report on Form 10-KSB. Results for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

1. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE – RELATED PARTY

Included in the accompanying June 30, 2005 balance sheet are amounts receivable from entities that have similar controlling interests as those controlling the Company. These receivables represent amounts billed by the Company for general and administrative functions performed by Gulfport’s personnel on behalf of the related party companies during 2004 and 2005. As of June 30, 2005, this receivable amount totaled $2,081,000.

Effective April 1, 2005, the Company entered into an administrative services agreement with Bronco Drilling Company, Inc. Under this agreement, the Company’s services for Bronco include accounting, human resources, legal and technical support. In return for the services rendered by the Company, Bronco pays the Company an annual fee of approximately $414,000 payable in equal monthly installments during the term of the agreement. In addition, Bronco will continue to lease approximately 1,100 square feet of office space from the Company. Bronco will pay the Company annual rent of approximately $20,900 payable in equal monthly installments. The services being provided to Bronco and the fees for such services can be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. The administrative services agreement has a three-year term, and upon expiration of that term the agreement will continue on a month-to-month basis until cancelled by either party with at least 30 days prior written notice. The administrative services agreement is terminable (1) by Bronco at any time with at least 30 days prior written notice to the Company and (2) by either party if the other party is in material breach and such breach has not been cured within 30 days of receipt of written notice of such breach. Previously the Company was reimbursed under an informal agreement.

2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The major categories of property and equipment and related accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization as of June 30, 2005 are as follows:

Included in oil and gas properties at June 30, 2005 is the cumulative capitalization of $2,766,000 in general and administrative costs incurred and capitalized to the full cost pool. General and administrative costs capitalized to the full cost pool represent management’s estimate of costs incurred directly related to exploration and development activities such as geological and other administrative costs associated with overseeing the exploration and development

8

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(Unaudited)

activities. All general and administrative costs not directly associated with exploration and development activities were charged to expense as they were incurred.

Also included in oil and gas properties at June 30, 2005 are leasehold and producing properties located in Wyoming, North Dakota and Montana which were acquired during the the first six months of 2005 at a total cost of $842,000.

A reconciliation of the asset retirement obligation for the six months ended June 30, 2005, is as follows:

3. OTHER ASSETS

Other assets consist of the following as of June 30, 2005:

Tatex Thailand II, LLC

During March 2005, the Company purchased a 23.5% ownership interest in Tatex Thailand II, LLC (“Tatex”) at a cost of $2,400,000. The remaining interests in Tatex are owned by other entities controlled by Wexford Capital LLC, an affiliate of Gulfport. Tatex holds 85,122 of the 1,000,000 outstanding shares of APICO, LLC (“APICO”), an international oil and gas exploration company. APICO has a reserve base located in Southeast Asia through its ownership of concessions covering 1.95 million acres. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, Gulfport paid $20,000 in cash calls, bringing its total investment in Tatex to $2,420,000. Gulfport accounts for its investments in companies owned in excess of 20% but less than 50% by the equity method.

4. LONG-TERM DEBT

A break down of long-term debt as of June 30, 2005 is as follows:

Building loans include $84,000 related to a building in Lafayette, Louisiana, purchased in 1996 to be used as the Company’s Louisiana headquarters. The building is 12,480 square feet with approximately 6,180 square feet of

9

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(Unaudited)

finished office area and 6,300 square feet of warehouse space. This building allows the Company to provide office space for Louisiana personnel, have access to meeting space close to the fields and to maintain a corporate presence in Louisiana.

Maturities of long term debt as of June 30, 2005 are as follows:

5. REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT

The Company maintained a line of credit with Bank of Oklahoma, under which the Company could borrow up to $2,300,000. Amounts borrowed under the line bore interest at JP Morgan Chase Prime plus 1%, with payments of interest on outstanding balances due monthly. Any principal amounts borrowed under the line were due on July 1, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, no amounts were outstanding under this line. This line of credit expired under its own terms on July 1, 2005.

On March 11, 2005, Gulfport entered into a three-year secured reducing credit agreement providing for a $30.0 million revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A.. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are subject to a borrowing base limitation which is initially set at $18.0 million, subject to adjustment. The credit facility has a term of three years and all principal amounts of revolving loans outstanding under the credit facility, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and fees, will be due and payable on March 11, 2008. The Company’s obligations under the credit facility are collateralized by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Company has not yet accessed the credit facility. The Company expects to use the proceeds of any borrowings under the credit facility for the exploration of oil and gas properties and other capital expenditures, acquisition opportunities, and for general corporate purposes. Gulfport believes this facility will enhance its ability to accelerate and expand its drilling operations and more aggressively seek out other investment opportunities.

10

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(Unaudited)

6. EARNINGS PER SHARE

A reconciliation of the components of basic and diluted net income per common share is presented in the table below:

Common stock equivalents not included in the calculation of earnings per share for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 are 2,322,893 warrants issued in connection with the Company’s Private Placement Offering which took place during March 2002. Also not included in the calculation of earnings per share for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 are 108,625 warrants issued in connection with the Company’s revolving line of credit with Gulfport Funding, which was retired during March 2002. These potential common shares were not considered in the calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect during the periods presented. No such potential common shares existed related to the three month or six month periods ended June 30, 2005.

7. COMMITMENTS

Plugging and Abandonment Funds

In connection with the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in the West Cote Blanche Bay (“WCBB”) properties, the Company assumed the seller’s obligation to contribute approximately $18,000 per month through March 2004, to a plugging and abandonment trust and the obligation to plug a minimum of 20 wells per year for 20 years commencing March 11, 1997. ChevronTexaco retained a security interest in production from these properties until abandonment obligations to ChevronTexaco have been fulfilled. Beginning in 2007, the Company can access the

11

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(Unaudited)

trust for use in plugging and abandonment charges associated with the property. As of June 30, 2005, the plugging and abandonment trust totaled approximately $2,837,000, including interest received during 2005 of approximately $21,000. The Company has plugged 154 wells at WCBB since it began its plugging program in 1997 which management believes fulfills its minimum plugging obligation through March 31, 2005.

8. COMMON STOCK OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND CHANGES IN CAPITALIZATION

Options

During the first quarter of 2005, the Company granted a total of 677,269 options for the purchase of shares of the Company’s common stock. The exercise price per share of these options is $3.36. No options were granted during the second quarter of 2005. During the second quarter of 2005, several non-executive employees of the Company exercised stock options by signing full recourse notes receivable for the exercise price of those options. The notes bear interest at an annual rate of 6%. All principal amounts along with related accrued interest are due and payable on September 30, 2005.

Sale of Common Stock

On February 17, 2005, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with certain accredited investors providing for the issuance by the Company of an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $3.50 per share for gross proceeds to the Company of $7,000,000. On February 22, 2005 the Company entered into another stock purchase agreement with certain other accredited investors providing for the issuance by the Company of an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $3.50 per share for gross proceeds to the Company of $7,000,000. The transactions closed effective as of February 18, 2005 and February 23, 2005, respectively. The Company granted certain piggy-back registration rights to the investors. The Company has also filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with respect to the resale of the shares of common stock purchased by the investors in the private placements, which has not yet been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in conjunction with the issuances.

Exercise of Warrants and Redemption of Preferred Stock

During the first quarter of 2005, the holders of warrants to purchase 7,736,621 shares of the Company’s common stock exercised their warrants for an exercise price of $1.19 per share resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $9.2 million. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in conjunction with the issuances. Also during the first quarter of 2005, the Company used the proceeds from the exercise of the warrants, along with a portion of the proceeds from the sale of common stock, to redeem 14,133 shares of the 14,292 shares of the Company’s outstanding Series A preferred stock for an aggregate of $14.1 million, including accrued but unpaid dividends. After the sale of the common stock, the exercise of the warrants and the redemption of the preferred stock, Gulfport received net proceeds of $9.1 million. An additional 145 shares of Series A preferred stock were redeemed during the second quarter of 2005 at a cost of $145,000.

9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, in accounting for its stock options. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for stock options granted in the accompanying financial statements. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (“SFAS No. 123”) established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123.

If the Company had elected the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123 and recognized compensation expense over the vesting period based on the fair value of the stock options granted as of their grant date, the Company’s pro forma net income and pro forma net income per share for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, would have been as follows:

12

Table of Contents

GULFPORT ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

(Unaudited)

The fair value of each option grant is estimated for disclosure purposes on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the expected lives equal to the vesting period. The weighted average contractual life of the unvested options at June 30, 2005, was 2.10 years. No options were granted during the three month or six month periods ended June 30, 2004 or the three month period ended June 30, 2005.

A summary of the status of stock options and related activity for the six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are presented below:

10. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS YET TO BE ADOPTED

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment”, which revised SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. SFAS No. 123(R) requires entities to measure the fair value of equity share-based payments (stock compensation) at grant date, and recognize the fair value over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the equity instrument as a component of the income statement. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2005. We have not evaluated the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), but adoption could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-QSB includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of historical facts, included in this Form 10-QSB that address activities, events or developments that Gulfport Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Gulfport” or the “Company”), expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including such things as estimated future net revenues from oil and gas reserves and the present value thereof, future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), business strategy and measures to implement strategy, competitive strength, goals, expansion and growth of Gulfport’s business and operations, plans, references to future success, reference to intentions as to future matters and other such matters are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by Gulfport in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform with Gulfport’s expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, general economic, market, or business conditions; the opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to and pursued by Gulfport; competitive actions by other oil and gas companies; changes in laws or regulations; and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Gulfport. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-QSB are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurances that the actual results or developments anticipated by Gulfport will be realized, or even if realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on Gulfport, its business or operations. We have no intention, and disclaim any obligation, to update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future results or otherwise.

The following discussion is intended to assist in an understanding of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2005 and its results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. The Financial Statements and Notes included in this report contain additional information and should be referred to in conjunction with this discussion. It is presumed that the readers have read or have access to Gulfport Energy Corporation’s 2004 annual report on Form 10-KSB.

Overview

The Company is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company with properties located along the Louisiana Gulf Coast. The Company seeks to achieve revenue growth and increase cash flow by undertaking various drilling programs each year.

The Company’s operations are concentrated in two fields: West Cote Blanche Bay (“WCBB”) and the East and West Hackberry Fields. The WCBB field lies approximately five miles off the coast of Louisiana primarily in St. Mary’s Parish in a shallow bay, with water depths averaging eight to ten feet. Currently, Gulfport owns a 100% working interest (79.443% average NRI) and is the operator in the depths above the base of the 13,900 Sand which is located at 11,320 feet. In addition, Gulfport owns a 40.40% non-operated working interest (29.95% NRI) in depths below the base of the 13,900 Sand. ChevronTexaco is the operator below the base of the 13,900 Sand. Gulfport’s leasehold at WCBB covers a portion of Louisiana State Lease 340 and contains 5,668 gross acres.

The East Hackberry Field is located along the western shore of Lake Calcasieu in Cameron Parish, Louisiana approximately 80 miles west of Lafayette and 15 miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico. Gulfport owns a 100% working interest (approximately 79% average NRI) in certain producing oil and gas properties situated in the East Hackberry Field. The interest includes two separate lease blocks, the Erwin Heirs Block which is located on land and the adjacent State Lease 50 Block which is located primarily in the shallow waters of Lake Calcasieu. The two lease blocks together contain 3,147 acres.

The West Hackberry Field is located on land and is five miles West of Lake Calcasieu in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, approximately 85 miles west of Lafayette and 15 miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico. Gulfport owns a 100% working interest (approximately 87.5% NRI) in 592 acres within the West Hackberry Field. Gulfport’s leases at

14

Table of Contents

West Hackberry are located within two miles of one of the United States Department of Energy’s Strategic Petroleum Reserves. This West Hackberry storage facility occupies 525 acres and has capacity to store 222 MBO in underground salt caverns.

Recent Highlights

The following are recent highlights which have impacted our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005:

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

Gulfport reported net income of $3,010,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $275,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This increase in net income was due to an increase in oil and gas prices and an increase in both oil and gas volumes produced and sold.

Oil and Gas Revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, Gulfport reported oil and gas revenues of $7,816,000, a 72% increase from revenues of $4,552,000 during the same period in 2004. This increase in revenues is attributable to a 29% increase in the average oil price received for the three months ended June 30, 2005 of $43.38 from $33.68 for the same period in 2004. In addition, the Company had a 24% increase in barrels of oil equivalents (“BOE’s”) produced to 185 MBOE for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to 137 MBOE for the same period in 2004. This increase in production was primarily the result of the Company’s 2004 drilling program commenced in July 2004 and, to a lesser extent the initial results of the Company’s 2005 drilling program commenced in March 2005.

The following table summarizes the Company’s oil and gas production and related pricing for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:

15

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses. Lease operating expenses not including production taxes increased $487,000 to $1,961,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $1,474,000 for the same period in 2004. This increase was due primarily to an increase in non-capitalized workovers performed during the period.

Production Taxes. Production taxes increased $501,000 to $1,029,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $528,000 for the same period in 2004. This increase was directly related to the increases in oil and gas sale proceeds during the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

General and Administrative Expenses. Net general and administrative expenses decreased $263,000 to $311,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $574,000 for the same period in 2004. This decrease was due primarily to increased general administrative reimbursements from the Company’s affiliates.

Interest Expense. Ordinary interest expense increased $31,000 to $63,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $32,000 for the same period in 2004 due to an increase in average debt outstanding resulting from two loans, with an aggregate original principal amount of $3,389,000 used to fund the purchase of the Company’s headquarters building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma during late June 2004.

Interest Expense – Preferred Offering. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or as an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. SFAS No. 150 is generally effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Previously, the Series A preferred stock had been classified on the balance sheet between total liabilities and equity. As of June 30, 2005, the Company has recorded a liability related to the Series A preferred stock of $14,000. The Company redeemed 145 of the 159 previously outstanding shares of the Series A preferred stock during June 2005.

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization. Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased to $1,452,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, and consisted of $1,375,000 in depletion on oil and gas properties and $77,000 in depreciation of other property and equipment. This compares to total depreciation, depletion and amortization expense of $1,154,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This increase is due primarily to an increase in the Company’s oil and gas assets as a result of the Company’s 2004 drilling program commenced in July 2004 and the Company’s 2005 drilling program commenced in March 2005 and the resulting increase in production.

Income Taxes. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $99,000,000 in addition to numerous temporary differences which gave rise to a deferred tax asset. Periodically, management performs a forecast of its taxable income to determine whether it is more likely than not that a valuation allowance is needed, looking at both positive and negative factors. A valuation allowance for the Company’s deferred tax assets is established if, in management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that some portion will not be realized. At June 30, 2005, a valuation allowance of $41,418,000 has been provided for deferred tax assets. The Company has no income tax expense due to a change in the valuation allowance for deferred income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2005.

Accretion Expense. Accretion expense increased $43,000 to $117,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 from $74,000 for the same period in 2004, due to a larger obligation at the beginning of 2005 as compared to the beginning of 2004, resulting from the addition of future abandonment obligations related to wells drilled during 2004.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

Gulfport reported net income of $4,940,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $315,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This increase in net income was due to an increase in oil and gas prices and an increase in both oil and gas volumes produced and sold.

16

Table of Contents

Oil and Gas Revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, Gulfport reported oil and gas revenues of $14,624,000, a 63% increase from revenues of $8,947,000 during the same period in 2004. This increase in revenues is attributable to a 28% increase in the average oil price received to $42.42 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $33.12 for the same period in 2004. In addition, the Company had a 19% increase in barrels of oil equivalents (“BOE’s”) produced to 350 MBOE for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from 273 MBOE for the same period in 2004. This increase in production was primarily the result of the Company’s 2004 drilling program commenced in July 2004 and to a lesser extent, the initial results of the Company’s 2005 drilling program commenced in March 2005.

The following table summarizes the Company’s oil and gas production and related pricing for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:

Operating Expenses. Lease operating expenses not including production taxes increased $1,105,000 to $4,027,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $2,922,000 for the same period in 2004. This increase was due primarily to an increase in non-capitalized workovers performed during the period.

Production Taxes. Production taxes increased $791,000 to $1,834,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $1,043,000 for the same period in 2004. This increase was directly related to the increases in oil and gas sale proceeds for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

General and Administrative Expenses. Net general and administrative expenses decreased $564,000 to $695,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $1,259,000 for the same period in 2004. This decrease was due primarily to increased general administrative reimbursements from the Company’s affiliates.

Interest Expense. Ordinary interest expense increased $48,000 to $121,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $73,000 for the same period in 2004 due to an increase in average debt outstanding resulting from two loans with an aggregate original principal amount of $3,389,000 used to fund the purchase of the headquarters building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma during late June 2004.

Interest Expense – Preferred Offering. As of June 30, 2005, the Company has recorded a liability related to the Series A Preferred Stock of $14,000. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 150 in May 2003, the Company has recorded $272,000 of interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 on the outstanding Series A preferred stock that would have previously been classified as a reduction in equity if there had been any for the same period in 2004. The Company redeemed 14,278 shares of the 14,292 shares of the Company’s outstanding shares of the Series A preferred stock during the six months ended June 30, 2005.

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization. Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased to $2,752,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, and consisted of $2,601,000 in depletion on oil and gas properties and $151,000 in depreciation of other property and equipment. This compares to total depreciation, depletion and amortization expense of $2,287,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This increase is due primarily to an increase in the Company’s oil and gas assets as a result of the Company’s 2004 drilling program commenced in July 2004 and the Company’s 2005 drilling program commenced in March 2005 and the resulting increase in production.

17

Table of Contents

Income Taxes. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $99,000,000 in addition to numerous temporary differences which gave rise to a deferred tax asset. Periodically, management performs a forecast of its taxable income to determine whether it is more likely than not that a valuation allowance is needed, looking at both positive and negative factors. A valuation allowance for the Company’s deferred tax assets is established if, in management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that some portion will not be realized. At June 30, 2005, a valuation allowance of $41,418,000 has been provided for deferred tax assets. The Company has no income tax expense due to a change in the valuation allowance for deferred income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005.

Accretion Expense. Accretion expense increased $85,000 to $233,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2005 from $148,000 for the same period in 2004, due to a larger obligation at the beginning of 2005 as compared to the beginning of 2004, resulting from the addition of future abandonment obligations related to wells drilled during 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview. Historically, our primary sources of funds have been cash flow from our producing oil and gas properties, the issuance of equity securities, borrowings under our bank and other credit facilities and, from time to time, the sale of oil and gas properties. Our ability to access any of these sources of funds can be significantly impacted by unexpected decreases in oil and natural gas prices. To mitigate the effects of dramatic commodity price fluctuations, we have entered into fixed price contracts for the WCBB production as follows:

Net cash flow provided by operating activities was $10,099,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2005, as compared to net cash flow provided by operating activities of $2,070,000 for the same period in 2004. This increase was a result of our higher revenues during the six month period ended June 30, 2005 attributable to higher oil prices and an increased level of production resulting from our drilling program commenced in July 2004 and our 2005 drilling program commenced in March 2005, lower interest on our Series A Preferred Stock, increased collections on our accounts receivable, and increase in accounts payable.

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $17,976,000 as compared to $6,910,000 used during the same period in 2004. During 2005, we spent $15,407,000 in additions to oil and gas properties, of which $6,905,000 was spent on our 2005 drilling program initiated in March 2005, $3,362,000 was spent on the seismic shoot in the East Hackberry field with the remainder made up of capitalized general and administrative expenses, expenses remaining on the Company’s 2004 drilling program and capitalized workover and recompletion activities on existing wells. In addition, during March 2005, we purchased a 23.5% ownership interest in Tatex Thailand II, LLC (“Tatex”) at a cost of $2,400,000. We financed these capital expenditures with cash flow provided by operations and a portion of the proceeds from the sale of common stock in February 2005 and exercise of warrants.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $8,828,000 as compared to $3,877,000 net cash provided by financing activities for the same period in 2004. The amount provided by financing activities is attributable to net cash proceeds of approximately $23,207,000 from the issuance of common stock in two private placements and upon the exercise of the outstanding warrants offset by the approximately $14,278,000 used to redeem 14,278 shares of the 14,292 outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock.

18

Table of Contents

Credit Facilities.

On March 11, 2005, Gulfport entered into a three-year secured reducing credit agreement providing for a $30.0 million revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are subject to a borrowing base limitation which is initially set at $18.0 million, subject to adjustment. The credit facility has a term of three years and all principal amounts of revolving loans outstanding under the credit facility, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and fees, will be due and payable on March 11, 2008. The Company’s obligations under the credit facility are collateralized by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Company has not yet accessed the credit facility as of the date hereof. We expect to use the proceeds of any borrowings under the credit facility for the exploration of oil and gas properties and other capital expenditures, acquisition opportunities, and for general corporate purposes. The Company expects to use the proceeds of any borrowings under the credit facility for the exploration of oil and gas properties and other capital expenditures, acquisition opportunities, and for general corporate purposes. Gulfport believes this facility will enhance its ability to accelerate and expand its drilling operations and more aggressively seek out other investment opportunities.

The Company has three loans associated with two of its buildings. One loan was for $99,000 related to a building in Lafayette, Louisiana, purchased in 1996 to be used as the Company’s Louisiana headquarters. This loan matures in February of 2008 and bears interest at the rate of 5.75%. In addition, in June 2004 the Company purchased the office building it occupies in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for $3,700,000. The two loans associated with this building, in an aggregate original principal amount of $3,389,000 mature in March of 2006 and June of 2011 and bear interest at the rate of 6% and 6.5%, respectively. All building loans require monthly interest and principal payments and are collateralized by the respective land and buildings.

Issuance of Equity. In the first quarter 2005, the holders of warrants to purchase 7,736,621 shares of the Company’s common stock exercised their warrants for an exercise price of $1.19 per share resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $9,200,000. During the second quarter of 2005, the Company used the proceeds from the exercise of the warrants, along with a portion of the proceeds from the sale of common stock in February 2005, to redeem 145 shares of the Company’s outstanding Series A preferred stock for an aggregate of $145,000, including accrued but unpaid dividends.

Capital Expenditures. The primary capital commitments of the Company over the past several years have been the capital requirements needed to continue developing the Company’s proved reserves and obligations under our credit facilities and outstanding Series A preferred stock. At June 30, 2005, there were 14 remaining shares of Series A preferred stock outstanding.

Gulfport’s strategy is to continue to increase cash flows generated by its properties by undertaking new drilling, workover, sidetrack and recompletion projects to exploit reserves and explore other acquisition opportunities. Gulfport has upgraded its infrastructure by enhancing its existing facilities to increase operating efficiencies, increase volume capacities and lower lease operating expenses. Additionally, Gulfport completed the reprocessing of 3-D seismic data in its principal property, WCBB. The reprocessed data will continue to enable its geophysicists to generate new prospects and enhance existing prospects in the intermediate zones in the field, thus creating a portfolio of new drilling opportunities.

In Gulfport’s December 31, 2004 reserve report, 78% of its net reserves were categorized as proved undeveloped. The Company’s proved reserves will generally decline as reserves are depleted, except to the extent that we conduct successful exploration or development activities or acquire properties containing proved developed reserves, or both. To realize reserves and increase production, we must continue our exploratory drilling, undertake other replacement activities or utilize third parties to accomplish those activities.

Gulfport commenced its 2005 drilling program at the West Cote Blanche Bay Field (“WCBB”) in St. Mary Parish, Louisiana during March 2005 with the anticipation of drilling approximately 20 WCBB wells. The Company now plans on continuing this drilling program in the WCBB field. The wells to be drilled will primarily target proved undeveloped reserve locations. Gulfport intends to also explore for possible and probable reservoirs by going deeper and directionally guiding the bit for untapped fault blocks. Completed well costs for the WCBB wells are currently approximately $150 per foot. Current net production at WCBB as of August 14, 2005 is over 2,768 barrels of oil and 1,922 Mcf of gas per day. Gulfport has drilled nine wells since March 5, 2005. Gulfport spudded its tenth well on August 10, 2005. Of the nine wells drilled, five are producing, two are waiting on completion, one is shut in and one was unsuccessful. The unsuccessful well was a shallow exploratory well that allowed the Company to satisfy requirements to maintain undeveloped acreage within State Lease 340 WCBB. As of August 14, 2005, the five new wells are producing net 638 barrels of oil and 1,901 Mcf of gas per day. Gulfport has completed seven recompletion/workovers this year at an average cost of $110,000. As of August 14, 2005 six of these recompleted/workover wells are producing a net aggregate of 809 barrels of oil and 871 Mcf of gas per day and one well is shut in. Two more recompletions are planned for the month of August.

19

Table of Contents

In Gulfport’s East Hackberry Field located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, the Company has completed the acquisition phase of the Hackberry proprietary three-dimensional (3-D) seismic survey. The seismic survey covers 42 square miles in and around Gulfport’s East Hackberry field. Gulfport completed the seismic data acquisition phase during the second quarter of 2005 and expects to have the final processed seismic data during the third quarter of 2005. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company spent $3,362,000 on this shoot for a total cost to date of $4,924,607. The Company’s outside engineers, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSA) had previously assigned 2 MMBO and 2.8 BCFG (net) to the proved undeveloped reserve category in the East Hackberry field. Since this portion of the East Hackberry dome has never been included in a 3-D seismic survey, the Company believes the shoot will aid in the development of its proved undeveloped reserves as well as allow the identification and exploitation of new accumulations and is expected to allow Gulfport to maximize efficiency in drilling wells to both shallow and deep targets in the field. In addition, the 3D seismic data is expected to allow the Company to drill existing proved undeveloped reserves and drill deeper in the same borehole to encounter new previously unknown fault blocks. This is expected to result in more reserve adds with less cost due to less boreholes required to capture those reserves. The drilling program in East Hackberry is expected to commence during the first quarter of 2006. Current net production at Hackberry is over 282 barrels of oil and 91 Mcf of gas per day. Gulfport completed two workovers in the field that added 45 net barrels of oil per day and reactivated State Lease 50 which is producing 35 net barrels of oil per day. One more workover is planned for State Lease 50 in the month of August.

Over the next two years, the Company currently anticipates capital expenditures of approximately $63,500,000 including the capital expenditures needed to complete the 2005 drilling program. Gulfport intends to fund this activity with the remaining net proceeds from the sale of common stock in February 2005, cash flows from operations and borrowings under its $30,000,000 million credit facility with Bank of America if needed. No borrowings are currently outstanding under this facility, and the Company has initial availability of $18,000,000.

Commitments

Plugging and Abandonment Funds

In connection with the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in the WCBB properties, the Company assumed the seller’s obligation to contribute approximately $18,000 per month through March 2004, to a plugging and abandonment trust and the obligation to plug a minimum of 20 wells per year for 20 years commencing March 11, 1997. ChevronTexaco retained a security interest in production from these properties until these abandonment obligations have been fulfilled. Beginning in 2007, the Company can access the trust for use in plugging and abandonment charges associated with the property. As of June 30, 2005, the plugging and abandonment trust totaled approximately $2,837,000, including interest received during the six months ended June 30, 2005 of approximately $21,000, and the Company’s obligation to make contributions to the trust had been satisfied in full. The Company has plugged 154 wells at WCBB since it began its plugging program in 1997 which management believes fulfills its minimum plugging delegation through March 31, 2005.

In addition, the Company has letters of credit totaling $200,000 secured by certificates of deposit being held for plugging costs in the East Hackberry field. Once specific wells are plugged and abandoned, the $200,000 will be released to the Company.

Accounting Standards Yet to be Adopted

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment,” which revised SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) requires entities to measure the fair value of equity share-based payments (stock compensation) at grant date, and recognize the fair value over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the equity instrument as a component of the income statement. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2005. We have not evaluated the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), but adoption could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures. The Company, under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has established disclosure controls and procedures that are

20

Table of Contents

designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The disclosure controls and procedures are also intended to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As of June 30, 2005, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon their evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of June 30, 2005, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company has been named as a defendant in various lawsuits. The ultimate resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations for the periods presented in the financial statements.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company used the proceeds from the warrants exercised during the first quarter of 2005, along with a portion of the proceeds from the sale of common stock in February 2005, to redeem 145 shares of the remaining 159 shares of the Company’s outstanding Series A preferred stock for an aggregate of $145,000, including accrued but unpaid dividends.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) The Company does not have a share repurchase program, and during the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On March 31, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company nominated for re-election all five persons on the Board of Directors of the Company. On April 15, 2005, in accordance with Delaware law and the Company’s bylaws, the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock executed a written consent re-electing the five director nominees, Mike Liddell, Robert E. Brooks, David L. Houston, Mickey Liddell and Dan Noles, to hold office until the next annual meeting or until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until each such director’s earlier resignation or removal. The written consent of common stockholders was executed by stockholders holding over 61.6% of the shares of common stock eligible to vote.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

(a) None

(b) None

21

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

22

Table of Contents

23

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

24